Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts

Saturday, August 29, 2015

The Nazis Hated Feminism




In 1934, Hitler proclaimed, "[Woman's] world is her husband, her family, her children, her house.
A popular way to insult women who want to be treated equally (ie not be harassed just for being women) these days is to call them FemiNazis. The term was invented by that bastion of wit and wisdom, Rush Limbaugh, in the 90s and has since been popularized by the hate groups who terrorize women online wvery time they open their mouths to say anything suggesting sexism might exist and might be bad. The term is ironic in displaying the speaker's ignorance of basic history, which is a cornerstone of sexist thinking in an time when even women who were alive back when women were barred from most careers and had only had the vote in the U.S. for 50 years support men like Paul Elam who make using men to hurt women a full-time career. I thought it might be interesting to examime the ways in which the Nazis were anti-feminist. My research is cursory, gleaned from secondary online sources like encyclopedias, and should thus be taken with a grain of salt and confirmed via direct primary sourcing for any serious scholarship, nonetheless, I am fairly confident it is generally accurate as the primary sources quoted included scholarly words, records, and other source-able material, and as it is logically consistent.

Nazism's central figure, Hitler himself, was an abuser of at least one woman in early life; he had a nonconsensual romantic obsession with his own (half-)niece, Geli Raubal, made her his housekeeper at 17, disallowed her to have consensual romantic relationships, abused and controlled her, probably sexually abused her in some manner, made her his prisoner, and finally drove her to suicide in 1931, out of despair because she could not pursue her dreams of singing, the man she loved, and was trapped with her a usive uncle who I think we all know was not a nice man. The Nazi party swept it under the rug in a typical example of a society that protected men who abused women. 
In an equal society, a woman would have more freedom, she would not be so easily controlled by a man. Her only hope of escape was marriage, and only if her uncle allowed it. Hitler clearly did not WANT this woman to have freedom and did not respect her feelings, seeing her as an object for him to control, an attitude that he would extend to millions of other people.
Furthermore, if the Nazis were feminist, surely they would not allow a woman-abuser to become their leader, right? Of course, if the Nazis were feminist, they probably would have had at least half their leaders be women. This is just the sort of thing sexist men take for granted - that in an equal society, half of leaders would be female, not 100% or so of them male.

Hitler is frequently quoted, from Mein Kampf and his speeches, talking about how women's role should be confined to motherhood. I'm not completely sure of the accuracy of quotes I found secondhand and in English, but given what we know about his actions we can determine such quotes to be in line with his thinking. In Mein Kampf, he says the primary aim of female education is for motherhood. He also said "A woman's world is her husband, her family, her children, her home, We do not find it right when she presses her way into the world of men."

His opposition to Communism, which promoted equality for women, is reflected in this quote: 
"The granting of equal rights to women, which Marxism demands...draws women into realms of society in which they are inferior."

This creepy quote makes a lot of sense given how he tortued his niece:
"A lass of 18 or 20 years is as pliable as wax. It must be possible for a man to impose his will on any girl. Indeed, a woman wants nothing else" - speech to Hitler Youth.

In my research, I found quite a few anti-feminist sites trying to put obviously fake pro-feminism quotes in Hitler's mouth, possibly as a joke, as if to say that if Hitler supported feminism, therefore it must be wrong, Aside from the fact that these quotes contradict his actions and other words he really did write and speak, if Hitler said the sky was blue that doesnt mean it is truly pink just because he was a bad man; it is simply bad logic. Likewise, feminism isnt good because Hitler opposed it, it is good for a variety of reasons that I think are frankly obvious but perhaps an article for another time anyway. 

As one example, one of the fake sites pretends Hitler was pro-abortion, which is only true when apploed to "inferior" people, but not as a support of women's autonomy; in actuality the Third Reiche not only made abortion illegal but imposed harsh penalties for it (and banned contraception) - for normative Aryan women, of course; for Jewish women it was encouraged or even forced. Mere discussion of contraception, even for the oppressed groups (why bother when they were to be killed, I guess) was illegal. While millions of Jewish and other targeted ethnic groups' children were mercilessly murdered, Aryan women were encouraged to have four or more children with Aryan men and discouraged from being single or having abortions. I mean, that just makes logical sense given Hitler's general game plan - if your goal is to have a particular race dominate, it just doesnt make sense to allow women reproductive freedom and thus allow Aryan children to not be born. At the same time, it is well-documented that the Nazis murdered homosexual and disabled people for similar reasons- their goal being to literally murder everyone who didnt fit their narrow idea of superiority. It is a strange idea that such a regime would view women as equals. Hitler glorified mothers but hated working, single women; single women were "staatsangehoringer", state property. Professional women were increasingly fired under Nazism. After 1936, women could no longer hold many jobs, particularly in leadership such as judges, not even as teachers or nurses. Feminization and modesty were stressed and even legally enforced.

Despite this, Aryan German/French/Polish etc women resisted in a variety of ways and were eventually needed, and even forced into, labor and military service, proving once again just how flawed this sexist ideology can be. While some women resisted sexism by becoming Nazi leaders, others resisted sexism and Nazism by becoming resistance leaders.  Because of course  the oppression of normative Aryan women is nothing in comparisom to the oppressed classes who were marked for torture and death.

Girls and Women who were Jewish, Roma, disabled, and otherwise deemed inferior were brutalized in specifically gendered ways in the Death Camps. Little girls are known to have been raped by S.S. officers, and females in general were often raped and beaten. There were at least 500 rape brothels run by the Nazis. Pregnant women were forced to have abortions or killed. Women were tortured in "experiments" and sterilized. Women could be forced to work or killed when seen as not strong enough to work. Women in camps worked together to survive and resist.
Women and girls were a key part of the resistance, even militarily. Women from many narions were eventually an importsnt part of the war effort. One well known girl was Sophie Scholl, a student who was executed as part of the White Rose French-Jewish resistace for no more than passing out fliers. Claude Cahun and Marcel Moore were gender-bending lesbians who used art to spread a message of resistance, decided to face death rather than give in, and ultimately died from prison conditions shortly after they were freed. And of course, Anne Frank is a very well-known victim of the Holocaust who still inspires us with her inner strength.

So the next time someone calls a woman a "feminazi", just remind them that it is people who want to force women into an inferior role and protect people who abuse women who are truly like Nazis, and it is women whi dare to resist who are the true heroes.

pictured: female resistance members






Wednesday, July 8, 2015

I Believe Them: Cosby and Rape Culture

When women first began telling people around them that Bill Cosby had raped them, over 30 years ago, the victims were discouraged from reporting to police, victim-blamed, made to believe that taking on a powerful man would destroy the victim's life and result in no justice.  This was the typical handling of rape victims at the time and prior to that time for thousands of years in a sexist society in which women had only recently earned the vote. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/13/bill-cosby-raped-me-why-did-it-take-30-years-for-people-to-believe-my-story/)
When one woman got some small measure of justice in court, and the man admitted to activities that confirmed he was a rapist, those records were kept from the public, the woman presurred to settle out of court, the press ditched the story, and the powerful man was able to go on to rape over 40 women.

When women again began reporting on this rape years later, older and more secure in a society that is less sexist and beginning to rebel against rape culture and fight for the rights of rape victims, the first women to report were told by the public that their word was not strong enough evidence to be believed. It's only one woman, they said, she is lying for money. Even though there is no money to be had from saying a rape occurred many years ago, and there certainly isnt any positive /attention to be had when people are calling you a liar and worse.  Whenever a rape victim stands up for herself, men and even women come crawling out of the internet woodwork to call her names and harass her.  Not that it's only online; in real life, women have been driven to suicide by angry mobs after taking their rapist to court, even when there is enough evidence including an actual photo or video of the rape that the rapists actually are convicted. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/rehtaeh-parsons/)

Of course, when rapists are convicted, even the rapists of children are too often given a slap on the wrist.  We read about people who raped children being freed after a handful of years - such as the rapist who was recently dating "Honey Boo Boo"'s mother, the rapists who live in "Miracle Village" (http://www.vice.com/read/inside-miracle-village-379), the judge who reduced a TODDLER rapist's sentence because he "didnt intend to harm" a TODDLER when he RAPED A TODDLER (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/07/kevin-rojano-child-rapist-sentence-reduced_n_7019762.html), the prosecutor who called a ELEVEN year old gang rape victim a "spider" and blamed her for being assaulted by GROW MEN (http://jezebel.com/5964064/lawyer-says-11-year-old-gang-rape-victim-was-a-spider-luring-men-into-web), the young teen mocked online for being a rape victim: (http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2014/jul/17/jadapose-online-ridiculing-rape-victims-sickening-trend), the Stuebenville case in which an entire community harassed the victim and protected the rapists, all while documenting the rape, then the proven rapists got less than two years in jail and the adults complicit got a slap on the wrist (http://www.newstatesman.com/laurie-penny/2013/03/steubenville-rape-cultures-abu-ghraib-moment); then of course there's rapsts like Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, and Stephen Collins, the latter a confessed rapist, who are beloved while their victims are attacked.  Then there are men who raped women or other men who walk free, like Mike Tyson, a brutal rapist who was offered a TV show after release.  People just don't care much about protecting people from rape.  Drug dealers get longer sentences. Homosexuals get more social condemnation.

Through all this, men are gathering online to express fear that women are demanding consent; of course, this fear for them is twisted into a fear of "false" rape accusations; many rapists don't truly understand what consent even is.  Many men even believe that being married to a woman, or having had a relationship with her once, or a woman being drunk or unconcious or seen as promiscuous, entitles a man to force her into sexual activities. This isn't something that evil Social Justice Feminasties invented, it's something that is well documented by science, such as case study interviews with rapists, and law enforcement like the FBI. 
Stats collected from FBI etc: https://www.rainn.org/statistics

Yet as more women are finding the courage and the social support to fight more forcefully against rape culture, many men are reacting by simply calling women liars. Nevermind the data.

As more women came out to support each other and bravely tell the world that they are survivors of rape, people continued to defend Cosby, saying that all these women and the various witnesses that also came forward, and of course all the journalists and lawyers involved with the accusations and legal case, must all be working together in an elaborate conspiracy to destroy one man for no real reason.  Because it makes a lot more sense that 60 or so people would work together flawlessly on a seemingly pointless conspiracy. It makes no sense when you break it down. Does the man really even have enough money to go around to this cabal? Why wouldn't the Evil Conspiracy keep their numbers smaller to get a bigger share and ensure secrecy? Why out him when threatening to out him - er, I mean falsely accuse him - is a better way to get money; why would he give people money AFTER they already have spoken against him, when the statue of limitations is up?

Speaking of which - a man recently killed a known child rapist (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/courtroom-applauds-n-man-admits-killing-molester-article-1.2262471) because he was unable, after many years, to prevent the man from raping.  The judge lowered the charges and the jury applauded the man. Yet online, the rapist has his defenders, who again believe that the multiple adult survivors of this abuse coming forward today to suppor the survivor who killed the child rapist are all in on some grand conspiracy together - because a man killing his old scout leader for no reason and making up a lie about rape, and somehow getting other people to have his back while in police custody, makes more sense than a man wanting to get revenge and protect kids from a rapist.

People will go to all sorts of insane lengths to excuse and protect rapists. And it needs to stop. Becuase ANYONE can be a victim and the only way to protect ourselves is by making the world safer for victims to come forward and less safe for rapists to walk free.

The majority of rape victims never report. Of those that do, the majority of rapists never spend a day in jail, nevermind getting a serious sentence of more than a few months. 

Police have turned away rape victims by blaming them or denying that they were raped, or even prosecuting them (http://www.vice.com/read/i-was-rapedand-then-the-police-told-me-i-made-it-up) and then covering up their mistake.  Police have also, of course, tortured and raped and murdered people. 

Police, judges and other people tell sex workers they cannot be raped (http://ethicsalarms.com/2013/11/02/can-a-prostitute-be-raped/) because apparently being a sex worker means your body is public property in their view, to be tortued as much as anyone wishes, because being a sex worker (which is often not even a choice, some women, girls, and boys and men are sex slaves) makes you subhuman in some way to their eyes. 

People make a joke about men being raped in prison (women are also raped in prison, often by guards, and they dont deserve it for things like being a drug addict), people think men cant be raped by women. 

Tens of thousands of rape kits have gone untested. For decades. Meaning police ARENT EVEN INVESTIGATING rapes when victims come forward. http://www.endthebacklog.org/backlog/what-backlog

Society blames and shames rape victims and denies the realities of rape.

What can you do? Properly educate yourself. Talk  to your loved ones, especially young teens and pre-teens, about consent. Stand up for rape victims when others say ignorant things.  Vote for politicians who will support victims. Get in touch with your local police and pressure them to support victims. Donate or volunteer for rape crisis organizations. Attend a Slut Walk or other protest in support of reforms. Write you respresentatives and demand change, support change in your social life, online, in your workplace. And keep educating yourself throughout.

What we need is a social change. We need people to be educated about consent and rape. We need police and the general public to be supportive towards rape victims. We need rapes adequately investigated and prosecuted. We need to end the statute of limitations and increase sentencing and sentences so that rapists are kept away from the general public. We as a society need to decide that rape is a serious crime and do something about it. And that starts by not pretending the problem does not exist. We need to start believing victims instead of automatically condemning them. We need people to be able to trust us with their pain, and we need to help protect those people - and in doing so, we can protect ourselves and our children.

Need help?
Call 800.656.HOPE (4673) to be connected with a trained staff member from a sexual assault service provider in your area. (via RAINN)

edit: I was thinking a bit more about the racial aspect of the Cosby case in particular.  I won't go too much into it, but I would like to say that (1) black men are certainly more likely to be seen a predatory (see my open letter to Dylann Roof), and more likely to be punished for rape. White men like Bill Clinton (who, yes, was accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault) are more likely to get away with it. (2) Of the very, very, VERY rare instances of actual false rape accusations, black men have disproportionately been victims (ie lynching), although in some of those cases a rape had actually occurred, the lynching victim just didn't get a fair trial and may not have been the actual rapist; in some cases, consensual sex may have been misconstrued as rape by white men (not by the female in question) with proprietary attitudes towards women. This is also true of most unjust rape accusations that are later exonerated - a stranger rape did occur, but the wrong offender was imprisoned. (3) Black women deserve to be protected from rape. Black women were systematically raped by white men, but they have also been raped by black men, and some of Cosby's victims were women of color, so while it is certainly racist that Cosby gets more negative press than men like Woody Allen, it is also racist to presume that the women of color are not victims of rape deserving of protection.

Edit: I would like to add that in Cosby's own words, in his own deposition, he said no woman had asked him for money. All they asked was for an apology. He refused.

Friday, July 3, 2015

Abuse & Redemption

One of the chief pieces of advice we tell abuse victims today is that abusers don't change. This is great advice for abuse victims. If someone is abusing you, sticking around in the hopes they will change is a terrible idea.  Of course, it is naive to think that all abuse victims really have the ability to leave - some fear if they leave, they will be murdered or become homeless or leave their children alone with the abuser, and sometimes that can indeed be the consequences, so we should not judge abuse victims who are forced to stay and assume it is always a choice. But generally, if someone is abusing you, and you are able to leave them, you should leave.
However the narrative that abusers do not and can not change is simply not true, and it is harmful to abuse victims, in another way, to cement this narrative so forcefully; people who abuse others are making a choice, a choice that may well be compulsive and difficult to resist, but a choice that can be changed. Many people who abuse do not have the reason and empathy necessary to change - but some abusers CAN CHANGE, and they should be pressured to change, we should expect and insist that abusers take responsibility for their choices and not feel helplessly compelled to hurt others.
I say this based on personal experience. Now, personal (anecedotal) experience is not in any way scientifically valid for several reasons; one, becausre there are billions of humans and my personal experience involves just two of those humans, which is a pathetically small sample size; two, because my personal experience is obviously heavily biased. So you shouldn't take it as Gospel (well that's an ironic phrase, given the Gospels are made up), and I'm not offering it up as such; it is simply my own limited personal experience which has caused me to question the absolutism of condemning abusers as monsters.
I grew up with abusive parents. The abuse didn't fully start, to my recollection, until I was around 11 years old. At this time, my mother lost her damn mind and I became a target, an outlet of her inner turmoil. The abuse ranged from private interrogations in which she would accuse me of thinking terrible things about her that I did not think, that were in fact her own worse fears, to hitting and smothering me. There were times where I feared for, and was in danger of, my life - smothering someone can, after all, kill them, and this was a frequent tactic of hers. In her mind, I think she thought I was out of control and she was calming me down, but in reality, she was losing her temper and physically attacking me, I was resisting, and then she would smother me to feel she had gained total control over me.  By gaining control of me, she could feel she was gaining control over her own life - after all, she had given over her life to Motherhood at a young age, so if she could control her children, she could feel in control of her life. 
However, this did not solve her problem, because her real problem was her own out of control irrational emotions and thoughts. She was filled with high levels of anxiety and anger, and in her mind this became self hate, hatred towards others, fear, and paranoia. 
She lashed out at her husband as well.  I bore the brunt of the abuse - in fact, when I would hear her getting angry at my younger siblings (I am going to be vague about myself on this blog precisely because stories like this are private - as you can tell from the introduction, there has been some reconcillation in my family for one thing, and I do not wish this to be traced back to my true identity, in part because I fear internet harassers like those who attacked Anita & Zoe as I mentioned on two previous posts) - when I heard her attacking my younger siblings, I would run into their room to deliberately put my own body in the way of the abuse and force her to re-focus her anger on me.  She treated my siblings differently, and until recently, some siblings denied the abuse altogether, while others had different experiences with it.
My father was also abusive, allowing himself to lose his temper and screaming mean things at people or hitting them.
The physical aspect, aside from the terrifying and dangerous smothering, was never the worse part. As a young teen who desperately needed my parents to prioritize love for me in their lives, the worst thing was feeling like my parents hated me. I became bulimic and self-injured by age 14.  It was at this time - a few years later, actually -that I first saw that my mother was not really entirely a monster, because it was at this time that my mother first saw the monster she had become for what it was.  When she saw the scars and fresh wounds on my body, she finally stopped seeing me as if I were her enemy and started seeing me as the child in pain that I was.  
No one should injure themselves; at worst it can kill you, at best it is a terrible thing to do to yourself. It hurt me in many ways and I still carry the scars with me.  However just as the narrative that abusers can't change is a good thing to say to people but not necessarily true, saying that self-injury can get you attention and help is a terrible thing for people vulnerable to that self-destructive compulsion to hear but it is actually the truth, and it is one reason why people self-injure.  Not that I wanted people to know I did it - I hid it for years, terrified people would know I was fucking crazy. but I am sure a part of me also did it because no one would recognize my emotional pain, the self-hate that I had been taught, the real fear for my life that I lived with, the fear most abusive victims feel that someday their abusers will seriously injure or kill them, the fear that I would commit suicide due to my misery and self hatred. 
People often don't recognize emotional injury as a real problem or a real danger. People like to pretend our emtions arent real or dont matter.  But that isn't reality; our emotional lives in most ways ARE our life, our quality of life, and if you are miserable in your life, it is a real pain that makes your life genuinely difficult to endure.  For me, the worst part of my abuse was how it made me feel about myself. I hurt myself because I turned my anger at my abusers inward. I was angry at myself for doing and saying the things that would cause them to be angry at me. All I wanted was for my parents to love me.

So when my parents found out that I hurt myself like that, they put me in therapy, and they started really looking at their own behavior and trying to change it.

The abuse did not stop altogether. The abusive behaviors still have not completely stopped. My parents still have that terrible combination of selfish choices and mental illness that cause them to fight with other people and be mean to loved ones for really bad reasons.

But my parents are not monsters.  They behaved as monsters for a time, and sometimes they still do. But they are people, complex people capable of empathy and capable of change.

My mother fought herself from that moment on, she started trying to force herself to become a bettter person. The monster fought back. Sometimes the mother won, sometimes the monster won. And gradually, over time, with medication and therapy and a lot of hard work, the monster started to weaken.

It took time, and it went back and forth in phases, and she will never be fully cured. I expect someday when she is old and her mind starts to go that it could come back again. But I do not hate her. She is still in my life. Because she fought for me. I forgave her, for no other reason than that she made it clear to me over and over again that she did not want to be a monster anymore, that she was truly remorseful, and she put that emotion into action in her life and maintains vigilance over herself.

At 18, I left my mother's house (almost) for good - she kept hitting me, and I kept getting up, refusing to fight back, and then I left. I barely spoke to her for many years. This was one of the best things I did for myself and for her.  If you are abused, and reading this, and hoping that your abuser can change too, first know that you should not expect that to happen and what you should do is get out as soon as you can and don't look back.  The best thing you can do for yourself, and for your abuser, is to walk out and lock the door behind you.  Not that your abuser deserves anything from you, but the only way they will learn to stop abusing you is if they truly lose you, especially lose control over you. They need to know that trying to control others is not going to help them control their own out of control emotions and thoughts. They need to understand that people have a right to their own lives and are not tools for the abuser to use. They need to see that when you hurt people like that, you will lose them forever.

Unfortunately, this was not the last time I would be under my mother's control.  In my late 20s, I was at risk of homelessness. With few options, I returned to my parent's house.

But this time, things were different.  I would have slept under a bridge first if I didn't feel they would be different. Which is not to say things were perfect. There were still fights. My parents still do not know how to control their anger. But the anger now is limited to real problems, not imaginary ones, and there are now limits and accountability where before there were no holds barred.  There is also a lot of love and support where before there was primarily abuse. We are all adults, and what happens is not abuse, it is fighting - which isn't great, but there is a difference between an adult raising her voice to another to say "I am mad and this is why" and an adult telling a child that the child is worthless, or smothering the child.  If you seperated their behavior today from the past, you would not call it an abusive relationship, you would just say they had bad tempers and could be assholes sometimes; and in all honestly, after enduring that terrible dynamic, I could now be the shit-starter and finisher myself, and there were times when I imitated the abuse towards them and they took it. I'm deeply ashamed of that, and did my best to control it and get my shit together, and it has never played out with anyone else, but the truth is that when you grow up in an abusive dynamic like that one thing that can happen is that you can learn to imitate that behavior. The point is, even at my worst, my parents now showed a new restraint. They learned and changed, something I once thought impossible. 
I have learned and changed as well. I am stronger now, I am peaceful, I control my anger and keep my mental health under control with treatment.
I still need boundaries with my parents, and none of us are perfect or ever will be, but we can now really spend time together in a loving way. I have forgiven them for the past because they have truly shown remorse and self-improvement. I have my parents back and my family now feels like a normal, loving, fun family. That is precious to me. While I would never tell an abuse victim to hold out for that hope, the reality is that redemption and forgiveness can happen, and did in my life, and I am happy to have my parents back. & I only have that because they truly made the choice to change and put the hard work in. We can and should demand that from anyone with a history of abusing others, because it is their duty and within their power. I am grateful to my parents for being the rare ones to do what they needed to do to be better people, and help me be a better person.

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Sure, Harassment is Bad, but Anita Sarkeesian is an Evil Sith Cunt-Lord Who Must Die!

'Just like in real life, women online often face a disproportionate amount of violent, often sexualized anger from men just for being women, particularly for being women with rational opinions like "women should be treated equally". This harassment has gotten so out of control that the mainstream media is starting to take notice. And just like the bigots of today always do, the HaterGate mob is flooding the comments of videos and articles to say that they do not personally support harassment, but harassment isn't really a problem, and also that bitch had it coming. Almost every video or article about harassment has comments from men attacking one woman in particular; Anita Sarkeesian. She has been threatened with death, driven from her home after her address was published online with a death threat, threatened with rape countless times, with multiple images of violence against her, even a "game" where haters punch her face.
& what horrible thing did Anita do to merit all this hate? 
She made a few YouTube videos on her channel, Feminist Frequency
Yea that's it.
Here are some of the truly terrible things she has said that deserve death:
"Objectification and sexual violence are neither normal or inevitable. We do not have to accept them as some sort of necessary cultural backdrop in our media...the patriarchy has not existed throughout all time...in all cultures...it can be changed...when we see fictional universes challenging or even transcending systemic gender oppression, it subverts the dominant paragdym within our collective consciousness, and helps make a more just society feel possible, tangible, and within reach." - "Women as Background Decoration Part 2: Tropes vs. Women in Video Games"

"We are asking for games to acknowledge that [women] exist and we love games... We've been playing games our whole lives."
"Do you believe that women should have equal rights to men and that we should fight for those rights? - Great, then you're a feminist." - Colbert Report

"Stop using violence against women as a way to further the storyline of a male hero, and start writing us as full and complete human beings. Okay?" - Women in Refrigerators vid (a response to a female comic book writer, Gail Simone's, similar observations).

"[women are] full and complete human beings with our own troubles, interests, and creative endeavors" - Manic Pixie Dream Girls Trope vid

"Instead of believing that [female] sexuality is something to be explored and celebrated, we are repeatedly told that our only form of social power." - "The Evil Demon Seductress

Ooooh, the horror! 

Clearly this vile harpy is LYING, because sexism in media can't possibly exist, right fellas?! It's not as if women are over half the population but roughly 12% of leading roles on film (I mean, unless you count actual data and facts, but that logic shit is for feminazis). clearly the only possible way to respond to a woman saying such terrible things as "I think things are not equal and I would like them to be equal" is to make her fear for her life and talk about how you want to violently rape her, right guys?!

Or you could just, you know, ...not watch her videos. maybe create a response. Maybe even listen to her and treat women like equal humans. 


Links:
http://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/research.html

http://feministfrequency.com

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/16/technology/gamergate-women-video-game-threats-anita-sarkeesian.html?_r=0

http://lby3.com/wir/ - Women in Refridgerators 

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Zoe Quinn is Not Your Property

A lot has been written, from the New York Times to Cracked, on the hate mob known as GamerGate. I was personally harassed by them, in a particularly transphobic, racist, and rape-culture-embracing manner myself, and no I do not need to offer "proofs" of this, the proof of HaterGate harassment is all a matter of public record that is easily accessible and blatantly obviously. What I want to talk about lies at the heart of the cornerstone of HaterGate and other such anti-woman hate mobs, the desire of men to control women.
Zoe Quinn - the "patient zero" who was the first victim of this injustice, a really awesomely brave woman - Zoe's relationship was her private business, as any woman's romantic and sexual life is. Women have every right to control their own bodies however they please, because a woman's body belongs to that woman and to her alone, her life is hers to live and no one else's to own or control. Her stalker ex-boyfriend couldn't handle that idea, and found a bunch of men who also couldn't handle it to help him try to regain control of her through harassment, using the Internet as their tool and conducting all their business very publicly. What he did is well documented, and no amount of HaterGate lies can erase all that evidence, Quinn has since had to make several police reports in the face of violent, often sexualized threats against her, all because she allegedly chose to have romantic and sexual encounters with people who weren't Eron Gjoni.
Eron did not and does not own Zoe Quinn. No man does. Women own themselves. So if Zoe chooses to not spend time with him? too fucking bad, man! move the fuck on with your life! You are not entitled to her time, and if you are willing to make her suffer like this you definitely don't deserve it!
The relentless harassment, anger, and violence towards women like Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian - whose "crime" was asking for less sexism in video games - is the reaction of men raised in a male supremacist culture, in what we all hope and demand will be the twilight of that oppression. They were kept separated from women, beaten into a stereotyped male role, promised supremacy, hidden from the realities of sexism, and they are bewildered and angry that women - who grew up experiencing sexism, being told that girls can't do this or that, being hit on by old men by age 12, and so on - these boyish men expected to keep their male privilege and are seeing women stand up and demand equality, and their reaction is rage. But you can't turn back the clock, boys. Women have a vote, women have money, women will not surrender power, women will have equality. Women will not be your play toys or your slaves. Women will be themselves for themselves and have nothing to do with you, women will be your equals, women will be your bosses.
And that's really the heart of this problem. Zoe was punished by the hate mob for being an independent woman, who made her own games, who dated who she wanted to, who speaks her mind. And all the hate against her hurt her but it didn't stop her, and others will rise up and have her back because that's how sisterhood fucking works, shitlords. 
Seriously, in my last relationship, my partner was dating a woman besides me, and you know what I said? Awesome! I like the lady she was dating and all three of us are still friends. I'm not saying don't be monogamous if that's your thing, but I honestly cannot understand the idea that what someone does with their own body when you aren't around is any of your fucking business. And if someone dumps you, I sure as shit don't understand why you can't just fucking accept that they have a right to their own life and let them go live it.  If someone isn't happy around you, you should WANT them to leave. Why would you ever want to be around someone who doesn't want to be with you?!
look, love and break-ups hurt and all, but you need to be a man and respect a woman for what she is - a person who is equal to you and doesn't belong to you. Women own themselves. A woman's life is hers to live.

If you want to support Zoe Quinn's work, check out her game, Depression Quest: http://www.depressionquest.com

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Open Letter to Dylann Roof

I wanted to start this blog under more positive circumstances, but as is often the case, I am driven to write not by joy but by desperate grief and rage; after the massacre in Charleston this week, I had to express myself, the truth as I understand it, to do my part to peacefully resist the lies of violent hatred.


 Having read the apparent manifesto by the admitted murderer, I wanted to respond to the destructive, delusional beliefs that he had that helped drive him to kill good people.  


But before I do that, I want to talk about the victims and survivors of this injustice.  Too often, when a young white man kills a group of strangers, people wring their hands over the killer, yet when an innocent, unarmed black child is killed by a police officer, his entire family is insulted. So I want to make it clear I am not writing this from that state of mind.  


But Why address the killer at all?  Why talk to or about him?  Because he did not act alone.  He acted based on a long tradition of racism, in a place where the flag of segregation and slavery flies high. He says himself that he was taught white supremacy in school, taught so much about how superior white people are that their whiteness wasnt even mentioned, and so little about black people that the few times they were mentioned it was in a tokenized way, until his world view was such that he believed all good things in life came from white people, which is not the least little bit unusual in America and many other places. He was encouraged by adults who knowingly misled this under-educated, willfully ignorant youth and fueled his hate. He was given a weapon by his parents. He had friends who listened uncritically to his racist jokes and took pictures of him expressing his racism, he was able to purchase symbols of his racism to wear publicly. So I write to him because I hope, perhaps wrongly, that maybe, just maybe, if enough of us speak out, our words can reach men like him before they hurt good people for no good reason. Because it is not the burden of black people to change their lives according to what white people demand, to become perfect slaves to white people, to beg white people to not murder them, it is up to white people to fix the problem of white racism.


 The killer did not see the men and women he killed as people, and they were indeed people, people who welcomed him and anyone else to sit and pray with them, whose warmth shone through the killer's hate long enough to give him pause even if he was too far gone to be saved at that time.  I am not personally a religious person, I should mention; I don't base my assessment their virtue on their beliefs, but on their actions in their lives, and that church was a place of peace, love, and justice, no matter how many times that petty white men with hate in their hearts attacked that church, it still stands strong.  


A few words about who the victims were is not enough to tell you what was lost, and is not as rich as you will see on other sources (ie http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/06/victims-charleston-shooting); the news is still raw, hopefully soon you will see more of their stories in the news. Their loved ones describe them all as sweet, gentle, even heroic people.


Tywanza Sanders was only 26 years old and a committed student who worked at a barber shop and played music. When Roof turned his gun on Tywanza's 87 year old grandmother, Tywanza bravely offered his own life, begging the killer to kill him instead of his grandmother, diving in front of her and another woman to use his own body as a shield. The pitiless killer coldly shot them all anyway. Sanders was also an activist in supporting the #BlackLivesMatter campaign after the murder of Eric Garner.

(I feel compelled to pause and point out the difference between this young black man who went to church and worked and made music went to school and was kind and quiet and ultimately a hero at that age, and the unemployed unschooled white man who did no good in the world and murdered innocent older women and men in a church, and how the racist stereotypes are so clearly false in this comparison.)

Susie Jackson was Sanders' 87 year old grandmother, the type of woman who took in homeless neighbors in need with no place to go.


Ethel Lee Lance, 70, Susie's cousin, was also a grandmother and had worked at the church for 30 years, known as the "heart of [her] family" who could be depended upon "for anything".

Sharonda Coleman-Singleton was a 45 year old mother of three children, a coach, and a reverend.

Reverend Clementa Pinckney was a 41 year old state senator and pastor of the church.

Cynthia Hurd, 54, had worked as a local librarian for 31 years.

Myra Thompson, 59, was a mother and her husband was also a reverend.


Rev. Depayne Middleton-Doctor was described as a "songbird", and was a mother to four girls.


Rev. Daniel J. Simmons was a war veteran, a father, and a frat brother whose family said "Although he died at the hands of hate, he lived in the hands of love."


Three other intended victims were also at the church and survived, among them a five year old child.


We can help the survivors by donating (http://www.charleston-sc.gov/index.aspx?NID=1330) or simply sending some words of support; by recommitting ourselves to actively, peacefully oppose racism and violence on a regular basis in our lives, by voting and educating ourselves and speaking out and volunteering and so on.


 If any of the survivors happen to read this, I want to tell them that my heart aches for them in their loss, the loss of the most valuable thing, a living person you love, which can never be returned, and I humbly admire their courage and dignity in the face of such true evil.  I can hardly imagine forgiving someone who killed someone I love, yet many of the families openly stated forgiveness and mercy to the face of this killer only two days afterwards. That church, and those families, rest on an unbreakable foundation of wisdom, love, and strength, and after this day I will always admire and love and revere Mother Emanuel for that, and answer the call when you need me.


I would also like to say that Roof's family are NOT the victims here, as the racist (havng been previously disciplined for using the N word in a court room to a black man's face) judge stated. No one shot Roof's family or their loved ones. Dylann is alive and his parents are the ones who provided him with weaponry and maybe with some of that hate. I do not mean to say they are not suffering, I certainly hope they feel sadness for the grieving families of the people their son killed, (and I know reports stated his sister was about to be married, and I can't help but wonder if he was trying to hurt her by picking this time to all but destroy his own life by killing innocent people), but the killer's family are not victims of a murderer, the victims are the ones who are dead or whose family members are dead.


 also want note that while we watch black people, even children in their beds, like Aiyana Stanley Jones, are murdered by police with impunity, an armed killer of nine people at a church was captured alive and is even protected by a bulletproof vest whle in police custody.


The first thing that I want to say to Dylann Roof is this: I hope you already know how your deluded goals have failed.  You wanted to reaffirm White Supremacy. What you did, instead, was show the world another example of how white supremacy is a terrible thing.  From your action, the exact opposite of what you wanted has resulted. Even racist white people with hate in their hearts cannot look at a young man shooting up a room full of elderly women and think that white supremacy is the solution to this problem.


I want to tell you personally that as a white person assigned female, your killing black women is not in my fucking defense. I support my black sisters against actual rape and murder that white men systematically committed against them, and I condemn your use of the issue of rape as an excuse to kill women, particularly when you have no concept of the difference between rape and consent, when you have no respect for women's right to control their own bodies, when you see women as your property to own or despise of, how dare you add an extra layer of evil and stupidity to your terrible crime and invoke the spectre of rape when you are a white man committing murder against women of color?!


In your manifesto (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/20/dylann-roof-manifesto-charleston-shooting_n_7627788.html), you revealed your ignorance and hate, but you revealed other things as well.  You called black people violent, but not one black person has personally committed violence against you, and you killed peaceful black people who welcomed you into their peaceful church and who pleaded for their lives and then forgave you. You showed us all an example of WHITE violence, as an extension of systematic white violence.


You also showed a basic lack of understanding of really simple science, namely, that humans are all of the same species, and what a species is, and what the scientific method is and how we know we can trust actual scientific results above racist assumptions on random blogs.  In the manifesto, you compared humans of different races mating to donkeys and mules mating.  This is not the same thing, because unlike those animals that are different species but close enough to mate, all humans of all races are the exact same species. Scientists - hundreds of thousands, at least, of people who went to school for a lot longer than you, Dylann, have even been alive to achieve, who have studied human beings for longer than you have been alive, have long since concluded that humans are all one species. Your guesswork about how black skin somehow has an influence on the brain was once commonly believed and used as an excuse for slavery and other atrocities, and the very reason people turned away from those assumptions is because they educated themselves. 


Hopefully in prison you will have some access to basic science books and you can see for yourself why most people do not base serious life decisions (like whether or not to throw your entire life away for an opportunity to kill good people) on mere assumptions, but actually do things like literally examine brains and conduct unbiased tests before reaching conclusions. If there was some dramatic difference in human brains based on skin tone, scientists would be able to see it.  And considering how recently, say, oh let's just be lazy and go with the Nazis, were in power, there is no basis to believe that some authority has held back this research. But even if there were some reason, like actual real evidence, to believe that some evil Jewish conspiracy kept back all the scientific research about how black people's brains are so naturally evil that white boys should probably go shoot elderly black women praying in a church, you still have no reason or right to believe that it is true if you don't actually have any real scientific evidence of it.


Stepping away from the 2nd person address to Dylann, which has become a cumbersome pretense, I want to explain how simple critical thinking and research failings were a huge part of his problem that allowed his own biases and desire to feel superior to others to lead him down a destructive and irrational path; according to his own words, he began his research into the Trayvonne Martin case at Wikipedia, which can be helpful but can also be edited by anyone and does not measure up to, say, the work of skilled journalists applying the scientific method to their writing; from there he went in search, via googling "black on white crime", of a source that would conform to his already present biases.  Upon finding that source, a hate group on file with the SPLC, he completely ignored other possible sources like, say, the FBI crime statistics that would have showed him that white people like himself did actually too frequently run around murdering innocent people, that most murder is intraracial, meaning most whites are murdered by other whites, and other actual facts.  I could easily convince an ignorant person, against common knowledge and data, that most murderers are truly blonde women by presenting them with a long list of blonde woman murderers, but that wouldn't actually be empiracle proof of anything, particularly given that most murderers are actually men, not women. 


Part of the problem is that Roof did not WANT to know the actual TRUTH. He wanted to feel superior to black people. Unable or unwilling to accomplish much of anything of value in his own life, he wanted to feel superior to others simply by virtue of his own skin tone, and also to blame an entire race of people for his own problems.  


He goes on and on about how violent black people are while planning to murder black people who had never committed violent acts in their own lives.  He talks about how black people are truly the racist ones while stating that whites are naturally superior and endorsing white oppression of black people.  This is known as projection.


Before committing violence against a group of mostly women, he accused black people of raping "our" women.  He saw white women as the property of white men.  In fact, he didn't see women as having any ability or right to choose consensual relationships for themselves, as he calls white women who are in interracial relationships "victims".  To him, "rape" is about a man having any sort of sexual or perhaps not even sexual but just romantic, even just friendly, contact with a woman that he, Roof, does not want the other man to have.  He apparently has no concept of what rape really is, what consent is, that women are actually equal people, just as he doesn't seem to understand what violence is and doesn't consider blacks to be actual people.  Part of his manifesto is saying that slavery wasnt so bad because not all slave owners whipped their slaves - as if that makes it OK to literally own someone and make them work for you for free. Did he not understand that slaves were slaves under the threat of violence, that is, of being murdered if they walked away? Does he see ANY people as actual people, besides himself?


He also expresses resentment that white people of today are held to some responsibility for the way white people in this country have historically behaved; because to his logic, only those who actually owned slaves should pay for slavery. But white people like Roof still benefit from their whiteness, which is why no one calls Roof a thug in the media and blasts his family, why he is still alive after shooting up a church, while black VICTIMS  of homicide are attacked as thugs and blamed for their own murders when they literally did not break any laws or do anything wrong; Tamir Rice was only a child playing in a park, for example. Myriad studies -remember that science thing I was talking about earlier? - and real hard data show the effects of racism; how identical resumes will end up with the job going to a white person, how cops are more likely to arrest black people for the same crime, and so on. (ie http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1870408,00.html). Racist attitudes are so hard-wired and ingrained in our brains that even black children still think black dolls are uglier than white dolls, that even white people committed to anti-racism make split-second calculations that associate negative words with black faces.  Roof saw the truth of this and spoke of it in his crappy, rushed-off little manifesto, but in the face of this evidence he simply shut his eyes, dug in his heels, and recommitted himself to his hatred.  To some degree his ignorance was a choice, and it is a choice people make every day, to ignore reality and to commit to ideas that have no basis in reality because they maybe like how they feel.


Believing something that may not be true is not always necessarily a terrible thing in the same way, of course; the faith that the people in that church felt was clearly beneficial to their lives, and while they believe it is true, they really don't have any hard scientific evidence of that belief.  But that belief did not cause them to harm themselves or others, instead it fueled them to be even better people.  So I do not mean to say that false belief alone is the problem here.  The larger problem is hate, blind hate and anger, and violence.


 Roof's commitment to feeling superior, to feeling hatred did not benefit him in any way. He lost his freedom and will almost definitely (if he were not a white man I would be more confident in saying definitely) be in prison for the rest of his life, where he is unlikely to be able to enjoy simple pleasures like getting an icre cream on a beach or deeper needs like having a fulfilling career, falling in love, starting a family.  The people he killed had worked hard for their lives, at school, work, for their families, in their faith. 


Ultimately what Dylann Roof did makes no sense in his life or in any larger context of his own goals and ideals.  He hoped to be a hero to white supremacists, but he will live out his days in prison watching a nation that I have FAITH - and I also believe I see good evidence - will continue to grow to become wiser and more compassionate, as people integrate more, oppose racism more. Perhaps some evil people will admire him, but most people will despise him, and only very saintly people will forgive him. There will be no "waking up" to a need for a return to White Supremacy. I believe, and hope, that ship has sailed; even as we still suffer under the effects of white supremacy and must continue to resist it, the reality seems to be that the future will belong to Equality.  I believe that and I will do everything in my power to make it so.  That is what people are truly waking up and seeing.


If Roof wanted to change the world, he could have done so many things; he could have truly educated himself properly, gotten involved politically, voted, volunteered, donated money, marched - hopefully on the right side of things, for peace and equality. He could have sat in that prayer meeting and listened and learned something.  Even if he still was a racist his entire life, even if he chose to pursue white supremacy, he still could have been a better person and had a better life than that of the lowest of the low, the man who murders good and innocent people for no good reason and not even to any personal or idealogical gain.  HIs life, at only 21, is a waste because of this decision that he can never be free from - except maybe in his own mind, in repentance. That has been the hope of the survivors. And I, too, hope for redemption - maybe not for this one man, but for our entire world. I hope for a world where people can live together in peace. We can make it happen. It is fully within our ability. We just have to want it - all of us.